Legal Opinion

In Re Snelgrove

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The single question of law presented by the appeal is whether error was committed in denying respondent’s application and motion for certiorari. The court’s ruling is based upon the dual ground of laches and demerit. King v. Taylor, 188 N. C., 450, 124 S. E., 751. The judgment must be affirmed on authority of what was said in S. v. Angel, 194 N. C., 715, 140 S. E., 727: "Certiorari is a discretionary writ, to be issued only for good or sufficient cause shown, and the party seeking it is required not only to negative laches on his part in prosecuting the appeal but also to show merit, or that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Womble v. Moncure Mill & Gin Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. King v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Franklin v. Crossnore SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Button v. Level Four Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API