Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pastoriza

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 2010No. Docket No. 288338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this cause of action involving the wrongful-death act, MCL 600.2922 and MCL 600.2922a, defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary disposition. On appeal, *263defendants argue that none of plaintiffs’ claims are compensable under the wrongful-death act. We affirm.

I. SUBSTANTIVE FACTS

As alleged by plaintiffs in their first amended complaint, the medical history of plaintiff Candice Johnson (hereafter Johnson) reflects that her cervix is incompetent. Johnson’s incompetent cervix resulted in her having a number of miscarriages. However, in 1999,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Patterson v. KleimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Dolan v. Continental Airlines/Continental ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PastorizaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Johnson v. PastorizaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Johnson v. PastorizaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API