Legal Opinion

People v. Birks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1998No. S057191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 Cal.Rptr.2d 848 (1998)

960 P.2d 1073

19 Cal.4th 108

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Lawrence BIRKS, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S057191.

Supreme Court of California.

August 31, 1998.

Howard J. Stechel, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Stephen Gilbert, Santa Monica, Linda F. Robertson, C. Delaine Renard and John Phillipsborn, San Francisco, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, William M. Wood, Esteban Hernandez, Robert M. Foster and…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Mosk; Concurrence · Werdegar; Concurrence · Brown.

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SalazarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. (HC) Schuster v. EspinozaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API