Legal Opinion
Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 9, 2015No. 11-73433PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on June 17, 2015, and published at 789 F.3d 1065, are hereby withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion and dissent filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Respondent’s motion to amend the published decision is granted. The petition for panel rehearing is denied. Judge Reinhardt would grant it. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. See Fed. R.App. P. 35. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.
OPINION
Jose Reyes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jose Reyes Ruiz-Vidal v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Jorge Valdavinos-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Luis Juarez Alvarado v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Leal-VegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Martin Vega-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Aracely Marinelarena v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Claude Bent v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Thavysack Thammavongsa v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020