Legal Opinion

Banks v. Mortimer

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 23, 2019No. 4:18-cv-07391-HSGUnknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GREGORY A BANKS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07391-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 MICHAEL MORTIMER, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17, 18 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action against the City of Antioch, 14 Contra Costa County, and individual employees of both the City and County,1 following the death 15 of Nathan Banks. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). 16 Pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API