Legal Opinion

Kuck v. Raftery

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1931No. Docket No. 7593PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant, Catherine Raftery, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff as special administratrix of the estate of John D. Siemers, deceased, adjudging plaintiff entitled to a certain savings bank account and determining that appellant Raftery has no interest therein. The undisputed facts established by the written records of The San Francisco Bank are that John D. Siemers in 1923 had two savings accounts in said bank in his own name. On August 20, 1923, John D. Siemers and appellant were present in the bank together and at that time Siemers withdrew the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Alger v. North End Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Estate of SiemersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Walso v. LatternerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Brucks v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kosloskye v. CISCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Evinger v. MacDougallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Katz v. GreeningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API