Legal Opinion
Lee v. New Jersey
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 28, 1907No. 16PublishedCited by 14 opinions
ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. The facts arfe stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
' Me. Justice Day
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Cumberland County, New Jersey, at the May term, 1903, of the offense of -unlawfully dredging upon certain oyster beds for the purpose of catching oysters, contrary to the statute enacted in that State. This judgment was affirmed in the Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey and this writ of error seeks the reversal of that judgment.
Section 20 of the act of 1899, amended, Laws of 1901, p. 307, provides:
“Any person or'persons who. shall hereafter dredge upon or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Jackson Vinegar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- C. J. Hendry Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Darnell v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.