Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1926No. 25,147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for publishing a criminal libel.

The sole ground for a reversal is that in a trial for such an offense the court may not instruct the jury as to the law. It is doubtful whether, on this record, defendant has raised the point. No objection was made to the jury being charged. In the motion for a new trial the actio a of the court in charging the jury was not assailed. The only fault therein specified ran to certain portions of the instructions. However, neither in the oral orgument nor in the brief is any specific error pointed out in the court’s statement of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. State v. BurpeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  5. Moschell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Branigan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jean CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API