Legal Opinion

Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 5, 2021No. 3:16-cv-00466Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Freedom's Path at Dayton, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:16-cv-466 v. Judge Thomas M. Rose Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority, Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY RECONSIDERING DAYTON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ECF 40. THE COURT'S MARCH 25, 2019 ORDER, ECF 65, IS VACATED IN PART. THE COURT’S PREVIOUS ORDER, ECF 65, IS VACATED AS TO “REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION,” THE REMAINDER OF ECF 65 IS AFFIRMED. DAYTON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF 40, IS GRANTED IN…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. United States of America v. City of Taylor, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Alisha Bronk and Monica Jay v. Bernhard IneichenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Bryant Woods Inn, Inc. v. Howard County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  5. Proviso Ass'n of Retarded Citizens v. Village of WestchesterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API