Legal Opinion

Immel v. Langley

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1959No. L. A. 25338PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This ease involves the propriety of a judgment dismissing an election contest after the court, upon a recount, found that two candidates for the office of county supervisor had each received the same number of votes.

At the primary election in June 1958 there were only two candidates for the office of member of the Board of Supervisors of Imperial County from the Fifth Supervisorial District, namely, J. B. Snyder, the incumbent, and Ray B. Langley, the contestee. When the votes were canvassed after the election, it appeared that Snyder had received 774 votes and Langley had received 788 votes.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dewoody v. BeldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McClintock v. AbelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Kerr v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Snibley v. PalmtagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wright v. AshtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Brailsford v. BlueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pollack v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Kincaid v. BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API