Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yancey v. Hamilton

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1989No. 88-SC-693-DGPublished

1DissentWintersheimer, Justice

I respectfully dissent because the decisions of the Court of Appeals and the circuit court were correct as to whether a newspaper can publish the opinion of a private citizen and not expose either party to a suit for defamation or invasion of privacy under these circumstances.

Yancey was arrested 13 days after a brutal double homicide and following his false confession to a relative that he had committed the murders. The newspaper clearly quotes the statements of various neighbors that this man was a smooth talker, a con artist and someone to whom the citizen would not lend money. It is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Haynes v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API