Legal Opinion

Jersey Estates Corp. v. Weintraub

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 13, 1947No. Docket 158/36PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants move to strike the bill of complaint on the ground that it does not state a cause of action. The complainant, the vendee named in a contract for the sale of real estate, prays for specific performance with an abatement of the price. The contract contains these provisions:

"This contract is entered into, upon the knowledge of the parties as to the value of the land and whatever buildings are upon the same, and not on any representations made as to character or quality." (Here follow a number of provisions immaterial to this suit, and then:) "It is understood and agreed that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Storch v. TeppermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Schultz v. PollockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Strell v. ZismanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Strell v. ZismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koppel v. Olaf Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Melcer v. ZuckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Koppel v. Olaf Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Dixon v. OberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. Dixon v. OberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API