Legal Opinion
Melcer v. Zuck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 5, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 N.J. Super. 577 (1968)
245 A.2d 61
CHAIM MELCER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN ZUCK AND ROSE ZUCK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND R.G.B. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 13, 1968.
Decided July 5, 1968.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.
Mr. Robert B. Silverman argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Julius Braun, attorney).
Mr. William G. Bassler argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys; Mr. Thomas Smith, Jr., of counsel).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Bertrand v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Four-G Corp. v. RutaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Lounsbery v. LocanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1874
- Bankers Trust Co. of N.Y. v. LobdellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Armstrong v. PolaskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Becker v. Sunrise at ElkridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Donovan v. BachstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.