Legal Opinion
Fitzsimmons v. State Industrial Com.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 7, 1925No. 15982PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This cause is presented to the court on an appeal from a finding of facts and an order of the| State Industrial Commission awarding the claimant, Charles Fitz-simmons, plaintiff in error, compensation from May 24, 1924, to July 5, 1924, on account of an injury received which rendered the claimant “temporarily totally disabled’’ during said period -of time.
The undisputed facts, as disclosed by the record, relative to the injury are as follows: The claimant was accidentally injured while employed by defendant Klinglesmiith En-geneqring & Construction Company, and hy a wrench to the back of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Board of Com'rs, Cleveland Co. v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Stephenson v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Wilson Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Cameron & Henderson, Inc. v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.