Legal Opinion

Donahue v. BOWLES, TROY, DONAHUE, JOHNSON

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 28, 1997No. 05-95-01159-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAPMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment declaring that a covenant not to compete is enforceable and from take-nothing summary judgments in two breach of contract actions. Appellee Bowles, Troy, Donahue, Johnson, Inc. (Bowles-Troy)' sued appellant James F. Donahue1 seeking a declaratory judgment that a restrictive covenant in an employment agreement between Bowles-Troy and Donahue is enforceable. Donahue counterclaimed, alleging that Bowles-Troy breached an agreement to purchase his stock in the company. Donahue also filed a third-party action against the other…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Guy Carpenter & Company, Inc. v. Anthony ProvenzaleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Arredondo v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  3. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  4. C.S.C.S., Inc. v. Carter, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Anderson Chemical Co., Inc. v. Green, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API