Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Zubris v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1983No. 639Published

1ConcurrenceWickersham, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority. I too would affirm the judgment entered by the Honorable Jojseph F. McClosky of the court below dismissing plaintiff | Zubris’s complaint. I do not concur in the reasoning adopted by the majority.

On January 13, 1976 appellant Mark Zubris was injured while riding as passenger in an automobile operated by one Michael Wallace. As a result of the accident Zubris sustained loss as defined in the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act1 including work loss and various allowable expenses. Subsequent to the accident Zubris *93learned that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bond v. GallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Myers v. USAA Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Platts v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Williams v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API