Legal Opinion
Southwest Distributing Co. v. Olympia Brewing Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1977No. 10802PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
Petitioner-appellee Southwest Distributing (hereinafter Southwest) sought a mandatory injunction against respondent-appellant Olympia Brewing Company (Olympia), seeking to require Olympia to supply and sell Hamm’s beer to Southwest for resale throughout New Mexico. The trial court temporarily restrained and enjoined Olympia from terminating the supply of Hamm’s beer to Southwest, and on December 8, 1975 it permanently enjoined Olympia therefrom. Olympia appeals and we reverse.
A distributor of beer, wine, liquor, institutional grocery and sanitary supplies,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Forest Laboratories, Inc., (Cross Appellant) v. The Pillsbury Company, (Cross Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- William F. Scanlan v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Distributors, Inc. v. Glenmore Distilleries Company and Foreign Vintages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- United Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.