Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. 18S00-9412-CR-01157PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendant, Stephen A. Johnson, was convicted of the murder of Harry Dean Baker. He brings this direct appeal asserting claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm the trial court.

1. Prosecutorial Misconduct

To support his contention of prosecutorial misconduct, the defendant asserts that conflicts of interest required the prosecutor’s recusal and that the prosecutor generally engaged in a pattern of misconduct at trial.

Baker, a twenty-six year old electrical worker and resident of Delaware County, disappeared in November of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maldonado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. Tippecanoe County CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rondon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API