Legal Opinion

State v. Hoak

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2009No. 34906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLansing, Chief Judge

Larry Matthews Hoak appeals from his judgment of conviction for first degree stalking. He asserts error in the district court’s decision to permit evidence at trial of other misconduct he had committed.

I

BACKGROUND

Hoak was charged with first degree stalking, Idaho Code §§ 18-7905, 18-7906, for stalking his former girlfriend through repeated efforts to contact her by letter and telephone in violation of a no-contact order. Before trial, the State filed an Idaho Rule of Evidence 404(b) notice of intent to offer evidence of misconduct by Hoak other than the charged acts. 1 The proffer included…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. GristIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. ClarkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HinchliffeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Cooke v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. Patrick Ian RodriguezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API