Babcock v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentPeterson, Justice
I think that the service of process on the commissioner of securities was good upon the grounds that defendant is estopped to deny that it appointed the state officer as its agent for the service of process and that its withdrawal from the state did not render the appointment ineffective.
The purpose of the blue sky law (Mason St. 1927, §§ 3996-1 to 3996-28) is to suppress the fraudulent sale of securities. An elaborate administrative process is set up to prevent and to detect fraud by requiring registration of securities, licensing of dealers and agents, and revocations of registrations and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.