Legal Opinion
Balfour Maclaine International Ltd. v. Hanson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 8, 1995No. 93 Civ. 8828 (AGS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARTZ, District Judge:
Currently pending before this Court is the motion of defendant Export-Import Bank of the United States (“Eximbank”) to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 For the reasons set forth below, we grant summary judgment in favor of defendant Exim-bank dismissing all claims against that defendant. .
BACKGROUND
In 1976, Eximbank and a group of subscribing insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michael Fonte and Gilda Fonte v. The Board of Managers of Continental Towers CondominiumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- R & L Refunds, Inc. v. United States (In Re R & L Refunds, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1988