Legal Opinion
Dickinson v. Matheson Motor Car Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 1908No. 116PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Motion for Judgment for Defendant Non Obstante Veredicto, on the Points Reserved.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
The plaintiff sues to recover the value of $16,000 of common stock of the defendant company which he claims was to be issued to him by agreement with C. W. Matheson, chairman of the Matheson Motor Car Company, Limited, a partnership association organized under the laws of Michigan, of which the defendant company, a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, is the lawful successor. The jury have found in the plaintiff’s favor, and the agreement must therefore be assumed to have been made. The circumstances attending it will he stated presently. No direct authority from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens' Savings Bank v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- MacGeorge v. Chemical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Rhoades v. Malta Vita Pure Food Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Pittsb. Melting Co. v. ReeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Bernard & Leas Manuf'g Co. v. Packard & Calvin, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dickinson v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909