Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1995No. 93-1251Published

1Dissent

Justice O’Connor, with whom Justice Scalia, Justice Souter, and Justice Thomas join,

dissenting.

Unlike the Court, I believe that general Medicare reporting and reimbursement regulations require provider costs to be treated according to “generally accepted accounting principles.” As a result, I would hold that contrary guidelines issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in an informal policy manual and applied to determine the timing of reimbursement in this case are invalid for failure to comply with the notice and comment procedures established by the Administrative Procedure Act,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API