Legal Opinion
State v. Arredondo
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 23, 2003No. 02-2361-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. David Arredondo appeals from a judgment entered on jury verdicts convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide and second-degree *380sexual assault, and from an order denying his postcon-viction motion for a new trial.1 See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1), 940.225(2)(a). Arredondo claims that: (1) his constitutional right to testify was violated; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion; (4) the sentencing court relied on an improper factor; and (5) his judgment should be vacated in the interest of justice. We affirm.
¶ 2. David…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. DensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. StraszkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.