Macarty v. Bond's Administrator
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL PROJ1 THE COURT OP PROBATES POR THE TARISII OF ASCENSION. This case comes up on an opposition to the tableau of .distribution, made out and filed by Narcisse Landry, administrator of the estate of Francis A. Bond, deceased. L. B. Macarty the opposing creditor, made opposition to the sale of a tract of land and slaves, which was adjudicated to XI.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROJ1 THE COURT OP PROBATES POR THE TARISII OF ASCENSION. This case comes up on an opposition to the tableau of .distribution, made out and filed by Narcisse Landry, administrator of the estate of Francis A. Bond, deceased. L. B. Macarty the opposing creditor, made opposition to the sale of a tract of land and slaves, which was adjudicated to XI. Treille at the second sale, for one thousand eight hundred dollars, and put down on the tableau as having been sold for that sum. The opponent alleges, it was adjudicated nominally to Trielle, but in fact for the benefit of the administrator,…
1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.
In this case the appellee, acting as administrator of the succession of F. A. Bond, deceased, filed a tableau of distribution, to which Macarty, a creditor, made opposition on two grounds: 1st. That the claim of the opponent against the estate, was set down as a simple, and hot as an hypothecary debt; and 2d. That Landry, the administrator, was himself the purchaser of the land; and the slave Charlotte and her child, nominally adjudicated to Hubert Treille. That the sale of said land and slaves is null, and they still form a part of the estate of Bond, and are subject to be administered as…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Derouen v. NorresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
- Dragon v. AnsardiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Heirs of Ledoux v. LavedanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.