Legal Opinion

Karney v. Wohl

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1988No. 53143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

Appellant Elaine Suzie Kamey asserts that the trial court erred in sustaining a motion for summary judgment filed by respondents Mark Wohl and Robert Wohl. The underlying petition was in three counts, with Count I seeking equitable relief in setting aside a settlement agreement in a dissolution proceeding; Count II seeking damages for the “fraudulent misrepresentations made by Mark Wohl”; and Count III seeking damages from both respondents, alleging that they conspired to defraud appellant. Finding that no appeal-able order was entered, the appeal is dismissed.

The marriage of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. Air Shields, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ritter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Gillman v. Mercantile Trust Co., Nat. Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Eschelbach v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Mullins v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Meadows v. JeffreysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. J & H Gibbar Const. Co., Inc. v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Earls v. Farmers Production Credit Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API