Legal Opinion
J & H Gibbar Const. Co., Inc. v. Adams
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1988No. 52693PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL R. GAERTNER,’Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action against the City of St. Mary, Missouri, and several hundred owners of private property in the City. In Count I plaintiff seeks to impress a mechanic’s lien upon private property adjacent to a sewer line pursuant to section 429.020, RSMo.1986. In Counts II and III, plaintiff seeks a money judgment against the City of St. Mary for alleged breach of contract or on the theory of quantum meru-it 1 . The trial court sustained defendants’ motions for summary judgment and to dis miss the three counts. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.
On October 27,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nicholson v. NicholsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ladue Contracting Co. v. Land Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Brunton v. Floyd Withers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brown v. StroeterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Berry v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Abbate v. TortolanoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- River's Bend Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Parade Park Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Miller v. MauzeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996