Legal Opinion

Bondholders' Protective Committee of Marquette Apartments v. Chain Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 24, 1939No. 6756PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Two questions are before us: (1) May a court, on its own motion, over objection of secured creditors (first mortgage bondholders), modify a plan of reorganization so as to transfer the control of management from secured to unsecured creditors without submitting the modification to, and obtaining the consent of, the necessary per^ centage of first mortgage bondholders? (2) Was it fair and just to all parties for a court to modify the plan of reorganization whereby control of management is transferred from secured creditors who hold the preferred stock in the reorganized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re 620 Church Street Building Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Continental Ins. Co. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Fryer v. Watco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Donald Arthur POWELSON and Mary Margie Powelson, Debtors. Appeal of James M. MORE, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Cleveland Hotel Protective Committee v. National City Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  3. In re North Atlantic & Gulf Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. United States v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  5. In the Matter of Donald Arthur POWELSON and Mary Margie Powelson, Debtors. Appeal of James M. MORE, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API