Legal Opinion
Holly Koliopoulos v. Paul Copenhaver
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2011No. 10-17414UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Holly Koliopoulos appeals pro se from the judgment of the district court denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We affirm in part, dismiss in part, and deny in part.
Koliopoulos contends that the Bureau of Prison’s (“BOP’s”) policy of considering inmates for pre-release to a Residential Reentiy Center (“RRC”) 17 to 19 months before their projected release dates denies inmates participating in a Residential Drug Abuse Program (“RDAP”) the opportunity to receive the full twelve-month RRC placement permitted by 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c). We do not consider this contention because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Moor v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Sacora v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peterson v. HindsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022