Legal Opinion

Central Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Schild

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,646PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

By this appeal plaintiff seeks to reverse an order vacating a judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor and against the defendants, and giving defendants leave to defend the suit on its merits.

The record discloses that on August 29, 1933, there was a collision at a street intersection in Chicago, between a truck owned and operated by plaintiff, and an automobile driven by defendant, Nola Schild, who, plaintiff claimed, was the agent of her husband, the other defendant, Clarence Schild. Three days thereafter, September 1, 1933, plaintiff brought suit against the defendants in the municipal court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clancey v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McGrath & Swanson Construction Co. v. Chicago Railways Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  3. Chancey v. McBrideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  4. Baird & Warner, Inc. v. RobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Van DeRyt v. Van DeRytOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Nashlund v. SabadeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. National Bond & Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. Lingerman v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API