Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shraberg v. Shraberg

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1997No. 95-SC-992-DGPublished

1DissentStumbo, Justice

Respectfully, I dissent. Both this Court and the Court of Appeals have repeatedly stated that simply because a party has entered into an agreement that subsequently turns out to be a bad bargain, that does not constitute a reason to set aside a freely entered into property agreement. See, e.g., Bishir v. Bishir, Ky., 698 S.W.2d 823 (1985); Burke v. Sexton, Ky.App., 814 S.W.2d 290 (1991); Peterson v. Peterson, Ky.App., 583 S.W.2d 707 (1979); Whalen v. Whalen, Ky.App., 581 S.W.2d 578 (1979).

This case involved the striking of a bad bargain entered into by a highly educated professional spouse,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bishir v. BishirKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  3. Whalen v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API