Horizon Marketing v. Kingdom International Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GARAUFIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, unpaid sellers of produce, move this court for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, restraining defendants, produce buyers, from dissipating assets that are part of a trust formed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, 7 U.S.C. § 499a, et seq. For the following reasons the preliminary injunction is GRANTED as to both corporate defendants.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Horizon Marketing (“Horizon”) and Venida Marketing Co. (“Veni-da”) are sellers of produce in interstate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- A & J PRODUCE CORP. v. ChangDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC v. Fierman Produce Exchange Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- John the Greek Co. v. Eaternity LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- CF Fresh, LLC v. Carioto Produce, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- CF Fresh, LLC v. Carioto Produce, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.