Legal Opinion · Dissent
Christopher T. Beidel v. Sideline Software, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 2013No. 2011AP000788Published
1DissentMichael J. Gableman, J.
¶ 65. (dissenting). Today the court undermines contract rights in the name of good faith and fair dealing, overturns thirty years of precedent, and inverts the employer-employee relationship. I respectfully dissent.
I. BEIDEL FORFEITED HIS ARGUMENT CONCERNING THE COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
¶ 66. Before discussing the majority's legal conclusions, it is important to first note that Beidel for*400feited1 his argument that Sideline violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Beidel never pled a claim related to the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, nor did he raise the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Market Street Associates Limited Partnership and William Orenstein v. Dale FreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.