Davis-Bilt Products Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LawRence, Judge:
Importations of torus tubes, so-called, in chief value of steel, were classified by the collector of customs as articles, not specially provided for, in chief value of metal, and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 22 % per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, effective January 1, 1948.
It is claimed by plaintiff that said merchandise, is properly dutiable at three-eighths of 1 cent per pound in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ball v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Page v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Downing v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Buchanan Electrical Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Moller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Keystone Brass & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.