Legal Opinion
Hulme v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 22, 1992No. 90-1142PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This case stems from claims of age discrimination and retaliatory discharge made by plaintiff Diane Hulme against her employer, Reinbeck Foods, Inc., and its manager, Kenneth Barrett. These claims are before us for the second time. In Hulme v. Barrett, 449 N.W.2d 629 (Iowa 1989), we reversed the district court’s legal conclusion that a person under the age of forty could not maintain a cause of action for age discrimination. We remanded the case for reconsideration on the record previously made. Id. at 633.
On remand the district court found Hulme’s proof insufficient on both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lavaughn Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Rush Pettway and Peter J. Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Womack v. MunsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Hulme v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Richard JACKSON, Appellant, v. ST. JOSEPH STATE HOSPITAL, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Phipps v. IASD Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Teachout v. Forest City Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- City of Hampton v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.