Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission v. LaPaille
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of the counter-plaintiffs to dismiss, or alternatively for summary judgment on, the counterclaims. For reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part, denied in part, and reserved in part.
FACTS
This action arises from efforts to redistrict the Illinois General Assembly following the 1990 federal census. The initial complaint was filed by the Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission and its Republican majority members on October 4, 1991, seeking a declaration that the redistricting plan which the commission passed that day…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING v. LaPailleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Illinois Legislative Redistricting v. LaPailleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992