Kelly v. Emery
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought tn recover the balance claimed by plaintiffs to be due them under a written contract for building a schooner for defendants at Bay City, and for extra work and material thereon.
On the trial in the court below the plaintiffs had verdict and judgment for the sum of $224.78.
Defendants bring error.
Under the contract the vessel was to be delivered in the water on or before April 15, 1887. The full price for the building of the vessel was to be $1,800. It is conceded that prior to the commencement of the suit the defendants had paid to plaintiffs the full…
2Cited by7 opinions
- People v. KasemMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Armstrong v. James & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Vinton v. Township of PlainfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Fleck v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Fors v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.