Legal Opinion · Dissent

Denison Municipal Utilities v. Iowa Workers' Compensation Commissioner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 2014No. 13–1808Published

1DissentWaterman, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the district court ruling that correctly reversed the workers’ compensation commissioner. The commissioner lacked authority to penalize the employer for failing to provide a first report of injury when the employee missed no work. In my view, the controlling statutory provision is Iowa Code section 86.11 (2013), which provides in relevant part:

Every employer shall hereafter keep a record of all injuries, fatal or otherwise, alleged by an employee to have been sustained in the course of the employee’s employment and resulting in incapacity for a longer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Lakeside Casino v. BlueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa Merit Employment CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Sorg v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Dunlap Care Center v. Iowa Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API