Legal Opinion

Grimaldo v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1996No. 13-95-373-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YÁÑEZ, Justice.

In this original mandamus proceeding, the relators, Maria Luisa Grimaldo and Maria Luisa Gomez, complain that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining a contest to their affidavit of inability to pay costs of the underlying appeal. We conditionally grant a writ of mandamus.

Grimaldo and Gomez, together with several other plaintiffs not parties to the appeal, originally brought the underlying lawsuit against their landlords, Leonardo and Julio Vera, for injunctive relief and damages resulting from an alleged pattern of wrongful conduct with regard to the leased…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allred v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pinchback v. HocklesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Goffney v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Jones v. StaymanTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Regalado v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Sosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Texas Honeycomb Partners, LLC, Kathleen McCarthy, David McCarthy, David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Shannon McCarthy, David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Ryan McCarthy, and David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Kevin McCarthy v. Alan Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  3. in Re Lydia Sosa, Relator, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API