Legal Opinion

I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order should be affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (81 AD2d 525). We but add that, under the circumstances of this case, once the parties had agreed to the deletion of the warranty clause and the appellant on that basis had accepted respondent’s sales note, whether the respondent still retained and thereafter exercised its right to accept the sales note at its home office would be a question for the arbitrator(s) (cf. Matter of Prime [Jonas], 38 NY2d 570; Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190).

Chief Judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & JonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CassoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re the Estate of CassoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. International Tin Council v. Amalgamet Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API