Sugalski v. Cochran
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentOlszewski, Judge
In this appeal from the grant of a petition for the return of property, we are asked to determine whether over one-half million dollars seized during a raid on a gambling operation was derivative contraband and, consequently, subject to forfeiture to the Commonwealth. I agree with the implicit holding of the majority that money, in general, may be subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. Sec. 5513. Because I believe the Commonwealth has proved that all the money confiscated here was derivative contraband, however, I disagree with the majority’s decision to return the seized property to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. FassnachtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Fairmount Engine Co. v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.