Legal Opinion
Ajamian v. Tp. of No. Bergen
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 30, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 N.J. Super. 61 (1968)
246 A.2d 521
ARAM AJAMIAN AND BERTHA HOFFMAN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN AND MILTON J. MUSS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided August 30, 1968.
Mr. Aram Ajamian, Pro se, and for plaintiff Bertha Hoffman.
Mr. Robert W. Bazzani, attorney for defendants.
LYNCH, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs Aram Ajamian and Bertha Hoffman[1], in the amended complaint filed in this action in lieu of prerogative writ, allege that they are the "owners" of a tenement house known as No. 2525 Hudson Boulevard, in North Bergen Township, New Jersey. They seek a review…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Health Department v. Rector of Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People Ex Rel. Copcutt v. . Board of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James v. Arms Technology, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Peters v. Township of HopewellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- State v. CunninghamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- City of Paterson v. Fargo Realty Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Apt. House Coun. v. Mayor & Coun., RidgefieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.