Lampe Market Co. v. Alliance Insurance
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Plaintiffs’ action is founded upon a fire insurance policy. The narrow issue presented by defendant’s appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to limit the jury to a consideration of the cost of reproduction, less depreciation, in determining the “actual cash value” of plaintiffs’ building.
The pleadings and a stipulation made at a pretrial hearing established the following facts: Plaintiffs are the owners of a so-called fireproof market and office building located on one of the principal corners of the business section of Huron, South Dakota. Under a statutory form of policy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Butler v. &198tna Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Kingsley v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Britven v. Occidental InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Citizens' Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitchburg Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Crisp v. Security National Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Elberon Bathing Co., Inc. v. Ambassador Insurance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hansen Housing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Tyler v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.