Hunter v. Milam
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; J. W. McKinley, Judge." Action by Jesse Hunter against Jane Elizabeth Milam, sometimes known as Jane Elizabeth Hunter. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
Jesse Hunter, the appellant, brings this action to annul a marriage entered into with the defendant at Los Angeles, California, on the third day of July, 1862, upon the ground that at the time of the alleged marriage of plaintiff and defendant the latter had another husband living, viz.-, one Joseph Milam, from whom she was not divorced, and-*108which said marriage between said defendant and the said Joseph Milam had not been annulled. The amended complaint avers that prior to the marriage of plaintiff and defendant, viz., in the month of February, 1858, at the county of San Bernardino,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Briggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Kiesel v. HeneckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Cunningham v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Moser v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 1916