ARNOLD v. MILLER
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PAUL D. ARNOLD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-01572-JPH-MKK ) STEVE MILLER, et al. ) ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND SCREENING COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Paul Arnold, claims he was mistreated in violation of Title VII while working at a Kroger grocery store. Defendant, Kroger Limited Partnership I,1 has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Mr. Arnold did not exhaust his administrative remedies and failed to adequately state a claim. Dkt. [6]. For the reasons below, that motion…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.