Legal Opinion

Locke v. Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1955No. 8329PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

This is an appeal by L. R. Peterson, defendant, from the trial court’s refusal to set aside a default judgment. On August 26, 1954, Earl D. Tanner, attorney for plaintiffs Whitland T. Locke, Ralph O.

Williams and Hayne L. Jarrard, respondents here, handed to defendant a summons and purported copy thereof requesting him to sign the following statement which was typewritten on the front of both the original and the copy:

“Receipt of this summons is acknowledged this 26th day of August, 1954, and service of the same is accepted.
“L. R. Peterson”

Peterson signed both the original and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Utah Commercial & Savings Bank v. TrumboUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Wasatch Livestock Loan Co. v. District Court Ex Rel. Uintah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Farmers' Banking Co. v. BullenUtah Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baird v. Intermountain School Federal Credit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Barber v. CalderUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Heathman v. Fabian & ClendeninUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Utah Sand & Gravel Products Corp. v. TolbertUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds v. Jordanelle Special Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API