Legal Opinion
In re Kominski
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 17, 1958No. 15PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, District Judge.
This is an application for habeas corpus by a prisoner confined in the New Castle Correctional Institution upon a conviction in the Superior Court of Delaware for Robbery. Pursuant to the requirements of Title 28, U.S.C.A. § 2249, the respondent (State of Delaware) filed with the Court copies of the indictment, the plea of the petitioner and the judgment together with a copy of the record of his hearing in the Superior Court.1 Two reasons are assigned for the petitioner’s alleged illegal detention: (1) That, after his arrest in May, 1956, he was not brought to trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States of America Ex Rel. Silvio De Vita v. Lloyd W. McCorkle Principal Keeper of the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Kominski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Latson v. State of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mezzatesta v. State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Kominski v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960