Skirvin v. Goldstein
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Bailey, Special Judge. Action by J. Goldstein and J. H. Goldstein, doing business as J. Goldstein & Company, against W. B. Skirvin. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
On July 31, 1912, defendants in error sued plaintiff in error in the district court of Oklahoma county, upon a certain promissory note. After answer filed there was trial to the court and judgment for plaintiffs for the amount due on the note, after allowing defendant a credit of $25, which was all he asked. After motion for new tidal was filed and overruled defendant brings the case here, alleging that the “judgment is contrary to the.evidence and contrary to law,” and “the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment,” and “the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.” The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Kirkland v. TrezevantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wellsville Oil Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Conservative Loan Co. v. SaulsburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Myers v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bennett v. MeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.