Legal Opinion
Hade v. City of Fremont
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 24, 2003No. 01-7632PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a civil rights case by a former municipal employee against his former employer, the City of Fremont, Ohio, (the “City”) and its Mayor, Terry Overmyer. Plaintiff asserts constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Pending are cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion shall be granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ motion shall be denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was employed with the City almost twenty-nine years until terminated on August 6, 2001. At that time, plaintiff…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rush v. PerrymanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Hemmah v. City of Red WingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Wood v. Summit County Fiscal OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Douglas Rush v. Barbara PerrymanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Parsai v. The University of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024