Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Rojas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 8226DC1090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on plaintiffs complaint and in dismissing defendant’s counterclaim. We disagree.

Summary judgment is properly granted when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” N.C. R. Civ. P. 56(c). For a moving party’s motion for summary judgment to be granted, the movant must produce a forecast of evidence which is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Stewart Office Suppliers, Inc. v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API